Feb 262013
 
one reel

On Krypton, the stupidest world in the universe, the effete elite are busy not noticing that the planet is about to implode. Enter Zod (a scenery-chewing Michael Shannon), freedom fighter, to bring power back to the people. Hey, this could get interesting. Nope, never mind. He’s a Nazi who also is busy ignoring the upcoming end of the world. Luckily, Jor-el (Russell Crowe) is an action hero and dragon rider, and with his manliness, he sends off his son to become a libertarian. Thus ends Krypton, but begins Superman’s (Henry Cavill, forgetting he can act) childhood in Kansas with an adopted father (Kevin Costner) so stupid he should have lived on Krypton. Now Superman will have to mope and whine until he can have an overlong battle with Zod.

In this remake of the ‘70s Superman and Superman II, Zack Snyder takes his second shot at merging Ayn Rand with comics. At least it fit with Watchman, but Rand’s Virtues of Selfishness is the antithesis of Superman. But then so is brooding.

Snyder has stated that he hates the character Superman, and it shows. It shows in the ugly, muted color pallet. It shows in the somber, charisma-lacking Superman who dislikes saving people. It shows in the insane, libertarian-wingnut that is Jonathan Kent who thinks it best just to let the weak die, and who we, as viewers, are supposed to like. It shows in the bland and incompetent Lois Lane (Amy Adams, who glows in other parts, but under Snyder’s care is a lump). And it shows in the non-stop Jesus metaphors. You see, Snyder also hates Jesus, which is odd for someone who obsesses over him.

To distance themselves from the successful Marvel MCU films, Warner chose to make their DC comic book films humorless. This was a terrible idea. But it is possible to have a fun humorless movie. However, Snyder doesn’t understand fun. Pretension, that he understands.

Snyder also seems to hate newspapers. Perry White is a pathetic editor (and has no reason to exist in this film). He’s matched by Lois Lane’s inability to be a reporter. But then Pa’ Kent is a pathetic father and Clark is a pathetic superhero. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a film where I disliked more people. I don’t want to spend time with them or their stories. Clark, Lois, Zod, Jonathan, Martha, Jor-El, Perry, the general/colonel/soldiers, the children and parents of Smallville—I am repulsed by all of them.

No one has a conversation is this film. They make speeches. That’s fitting as Man of Steel isn’t a motion picture, not one where events flow. It is a series of self-serious moments, clipped together. It is all very, very important, at least to Snyder. To anyone else…not so much. It ends in a battle that goes on and on and on. Many fans have indicated that the result of that battle ruins the movie, but there’s nothing to ruin.

Man of Steel was followed by the worst big budget film I’ve ever seen, Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice. Superman had previously appeared in Superman verses the Mole People (1951) and Superman (1978), Superman II (1980), Superman III (1983), and Superman IV: The Quest For Peace (1983), and semi-sequel Superman Returns (2006).

 Reviews, Superhero Tagged with:
Feb 232013
  February 23, 2013

Just in time, my choices for the Academy Awards. Since so many of this year’s best weren’t nominated, I’ve selected a best from the nominated works, and then what I consider to be actually the best in that category. Perhaps a secret write-in campaign will follow my choices. Perhaps not…

I’ve skipped a few categories for various reasons (no song deserves anything this year, missed as few docs and shorts, saw several films only on the small screen makes judging sound unfair, etc)

Onward.  This is not a prediction of what will win, but what should win.

Picture

Nominees: Amour, Argo, Beasts of the Southern Wild, Django Unchained, Les Misérables, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Silver Linings Playbook, Zero Dark Thirty

Best of Nominees: Django Unchained
Best: Marvel’s The Avengers

 

Director

Nominees: Michael Haneke (Amour), Ang Lee (Life of Pi), David O. Russell (Silver Linings Playbook), Steven Spielberg (Lincoln), Benh Zeitlin (Beasts of the Southern Wild)

Best of Nominees: Steven Spielberg
Best: Ridley Scott (Prometheus)

Actor

Nominees: Bradley Cooper (Silver Linings Playbook), Daniel Day-Lewis (Lincoln), Hugh Jackman (Les Misérables), Joaquin Phoenix (The Master), Denzel Washington (Flight)

Best of Nominees: Daniel Day-Lewis
Best: Daniel Day-Lewis

 

Actress

Nominees: Jessica Chastain (Zero Dark Thirty), Jennifer Lawrence (Silver Linings Playbook), Emmanuelle Riva (Amour),  Quvenzhané Wallis (Beasts of the Southern Wild), Naomi Watts (The Impossible)

Best of Nominees: Naomi Watts
Best: Naomi Watts

 

Supporting Actor     

Nominees: Alan Arkin (Argo), Robert De Niro (Silver Linings Playbook), Philip Seymour Hoffman (The Master), Tommy Lee Jones (Lincoln), Christoph Waltz (Django Unchained)

Best of Nominees: Philip Seymour Hoffman
Best: Michael Fassbender (Prometheus)

 

Supporting Actress

Nominees: Amy Adams (The Master), Sally Field (Lincoln), Anne Hathaway (Les Misérables), Helen Hunt (The Sessions), Jacki Weaver (Silver Linings Playbook)

Best of Nominees: Anne Hathaway
Best: Anne Hathaway

 

Writing – Original Screenplay

Nominees: Amour, Django Unchained, Flight, Moonrise Kingdom, Zero Dark Thirty

Best of Nominees: Django Unchained
Best: Marvel’s The Avengers (unless we count it as an Adapted Screenplay, in which case it is best there)

 

Writing – Adapted Screenplay

Nominees: Argo, Beasts of the Southern Wild, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Silver Linings Playbook

Best of Nominees: Lincoln
Best: {See Original Screenplay}

 

Best Animated Feature        

Nominees: Brave, Frankenweenie, ParaNorman, The Pirates! Band of Misfits, Wreck-It Ralph

Best of Nominees: Brave
Best: Brave

 

Best Production Design       

Nominees: Anna Karenina, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Les Misérables, Life of Pi, Lincoln

Best of Nominees: Anna Karenina
Best: Upside Down

Best Cinematography

Nominees: Anna Karenina, Django Unchained, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Skyfall

Best of Nominees: Anna Karenina
Best: Prometheus

 

Best Makeup and Hairstyling         

Nominees:  Hitchcock,The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Les Misérables

Best of Nominees: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
Best: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

Best Film Editing      

Nominees: Argo, Life of Pi, Lincoln, Silver Linings Playbook, Zero Dark Thirty

Best of Nominees: none (they are all horrible in editing)
Best: Marvel’s The Avengers

 

Best Visual Effects

Nominees: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Life of Pi, Marvel’s The Avengers, Prometheus, Snow White and the Huntsman

Best of Nominees: Marvel’s The Avengers
Best: Marvel’s The Avengers

 

 

Feb 222013
 

Once again the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences have created a feeble list, but it is what we’ve got, so I’ll sort it.

Let’s see: Amour is a linear affair that holds off for two hours what was obvious in 10 minutes and manages to be oddly distancing for a story that has nothing to offer but emotion. Argo and Zero Dark Thirty are semi-true tales that are only interesting if they are true. Beasts of the Southern Wild is on the list because the Academy likes indies and fantasy films that aren’t fantasies. Django Unchained is clever and timely; not Tarantino’s best, but one of his better works. Les Misérables is a horrendously shot, poorly sung, never ending festival of tedium with only a single true moment (and that should be rewarded in the supporting actress category). Life of Pi looked beautiful, and was fairly successful, but Lee just couldn’t elevate it to what it should have been. Lincoln was powerful with great moments. One of the few films that should be on this list, but the script meandered, departing from its real story of the 13th Amendment to Lincoln’s personal life far too often, but not often enough to say anything. Silver Linings Playbook could have been a zany romantic comedy, or a complex drama about mental illness. By trying to combine these, it became an unfunny comedy that deals with mental illness in a thoughtless, closing in on offensive, manner. So:

9 – Amour

8 – Les Misérables

7 – Silver Linings Playbook

6 – Beasts of the Southern Wild

5 – Zero Dark Thirty

4 – Argo

3 – Life of Pi

2 – Lincoln

1 – Django Unchained

 

Feb 222013
  February 22, 2013

The Academy loves docudramas. I’d say it’s because it makes members feel smart, but that’s psychology and what do I know about psychology? This year we’ve got two nominated for best picture (OK, there are three, but Lincoln is a whole different critter), both CIA spy stories, and both closely related to the truth. Not truth, but related to the truth. They are similar to the truth, and oh, what sins can hide in similarity. And they hide there because these films are sold as truth, just with a footnote of crossed fingers.

A few years back the docudramas of the moment were The King’s Speech and The Social Network. They shared a problem, but it is so much clearer with The Social Network: It was only interesting because it was real. Would anyone have even sat through The Social Network if it was about the languid rise of a fictitious computer programmer named Fred, and the film’s ending was known to all?  There just wasn’t enough story, or conflict, or development. But hey, that’s OK, because it was real. Except it wasn’t. Through omission, Zuckerberg’s biography was altered, and his motivation was created. What we were given was a movie too inaccurate to be a documentary, and not interesting enough for a narrative.

Which brings us back to 2013. Neither of the docudramas have much in the way of plot. Argo has enough of a story for a cute 45 minute short. It follows a CIA agent as he attempts to get six US embassy workers, who have been hiding with the Canadian ambassador, out of Iran during the Iran Hostage Crisis. He does this by creating a fake film, that is to be shot in Iran, and claiming the “house guests” are Canadian filmmakers. Zero Dark Thirty‘s plot can be covered in one tag line: CIA agent has a hunch on how to find and kill Bin Laden, and she’s right. What saves them, what should save them, is their reality. But of course, they are only related to reality.

Argo‘s shifts from truth are less damming, and harder to understand. OK, I get why they added a nonexistent chase at the airport (as the 6 Americans are escaping on a plane). The reality of their covers holding up and them passing through customs smoothly is not terribly dramatic. But why downplay the Canadian’s role? Or state that the British refused to help? Those are pointless lies. And why make up a never-existing sci-fi  script, when in reality they used the screenplay and art for a film version of Zelazny’s classic novel Lord of Light. Any science fiction fan would be all over that nugget of information. But instead Affleck and company go for a less interesting fiction.

Zero Dark Thirty is a police procedural, with spies. For two hours it follows Maya, an obsessed, methodical desk jocky, who likes to go with her hunches. She looks at a lot of pictures, questions a lot of prisoners, takes a lot of notes, and without the facade of this being real, every viewer would be snoring. She does hang around torture at the beginning, which isn’t entertaining, but at least something is happening. At the end, the film violates good story telling form by leaving the only character we’ve been with for two hours, to give us twenty minutes of Bin Laden killing with characters we don’t know (If Bin Laden’s death is a spoiler for you, you need to read the news more often). Unlike Argo, which at least has an amusing premise, Zero Dark Thirty has nothing except the truth. (Yes, the acting is good, but good acting does not make a good movie.) The killing of Bin Laden was a significant event; it is important. It is worth the truth. But this isn’t the truth…not quite.

I’ll narrow my focus to one bit, the most notorious part of the film: the torture scenes. Maya gets her big break from the torture of a prisoner. Many congressional movers and shakers have come out saying that isn’t true. Is it true?  Is it false? It is really essential to know in our current political climate. It is essential to the story. But director Kathryn Bigelow and writer Mark Boal didn’t care. They have no idea what is true, and Bigelow has stated she just put in the scene because torture was part of what was going on, and that was a good place to put it dramatically. She isn’t lying, she’s just making shit up.

Most people smile and say it is dramatic (or poetic) license, and then put it out of their minds. But this is the history that people will remember. Truth gets lost in dramatic license, and that’s a shame. But I’m a film critic, not a historian. So I can instead say that it’s a shame for film as well. These are movies that are loved because viewers can laugh afterwards and say “Wow, you just can’t make that stuff up.”

Only they did.

And if everyone clearly understood that they did, no one would care about these films.

Feb 212013
  February 21, 2013

Watching all of the films nominated for awards in the major categories for the 2012 Academy Awards. This means they are responsible for the my torturous two hours of Amour. Yet, if I were to hit the members of the Academy with a rock, I’d be in trouble.

Feb 172013
  February 17, 2013

Watching it now. My god, does Les Misérables ever end? Or does it just go on and on, forever, with semi-songs searching, but rarely finding a melody, and actors constantly in fear of having their noses smacked by the camera?